Treedom: Plant or Gift a Tree and Follow the Story Online

CNH Industrial has partnered with Treedom, the first web platform that lets you remotely plant a tree and keep track of the project online, on March 15, 2022, according to /3BL Media. Since its inception in 2010 in Florence, Italy, Treedom has planted close to three million trees in Africa, Asia, South America, and Italy. Farmers in the area directly plant the trees, which contribute to the development of environmental, social, and economic benefits for the communities they serve.


There will be approximately 200 trees planted in Nepal, Cameroon, Colombia, and Tanzania as part of the “Global CNH Industrial Forest.” Each newly planted tree will be individually photographed and geolocated, allowing the recipient to view, update, and view photos of their own tree.

On the occasion of the company’s Capital Markets Day event, which was held both in person and online and took place in Miami, CNH Industrial planted trees. The company took a number of steps to lessen the event’s impact in order to make it as sustainable and eco-friendly as possible. One of these was committing a tree to visitors going to face to face by which they had the option to recover their picked tree to be established for their sake.


The UN secretary-general stated that nuclear war is “back within the realm of possibility.” From that point forward, atomic dangers have kept on raising worries an atomic weapon could be utilized in a contention without precedent for many years.


Recently, a lot of attention has been paid to the possibility that Russian President Vladimir Putin will use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine in a last-ditch attempt to alter the tactics of his army on the battlefield. However, Putin has also issued warnings to NATO and the United States.


Additionally, Putin suggested in December that Russia might abandon its “no first use” military doctrine, which states that nuclear weapons would only be used in extreme circumstances.


Putin stated at a news conference held in Kyrgyzstan, “They [the United States] have it in their strategy, in the documents it is spelled out – a preventive blow.” We are not. In contrast, we have developed a retaliatory strike as part of our strategy.


Even though there is a low likelihood that tensions between the US and Russia will escalate into open conflict and nuclear war, there is still a threat.


A shocking threat even by the extreme standards of the Russian regime, the state media of Russia detailed in 2017 how Moscow would annihilate US cities and areas if a nuclear treaty broke down, putting Cold War rivals back in target mode.


According to Reuters, Russian state television hyped up a brand-new hypersonic nuclear-capable missile and stated that the Pentagon, Camp David, Washington’s Jim Creek Naval Radio Station, Maryland’s Fort Ritchie, and California’s McClellan Air Force Base would be targets.


However, the last two have been closed for more than two decades, making them odd targets.


It is best to take the claims made by Russia and its heavily censored media with a grain of salt. When it comes to nuclear targets, Insider sought the advice of experts to determine where Moscow would most likely attempt to strike.


Strategic planners believe that a nuclear attack will focus on countering the enemy’s nuclear forces β€” destroying them before they can counterattack β€” even though large population centers with significant cultural impact may seem like obvious choices. Since the Cold War, the US and Russia have developed plans on how to best wage nuclear war against each other.


The author of “Atomic Audit,” Stephen Schwartz, asserts the following: The Costs and Consequences of US Nuclear Weapons Since 1940″ shifted the focus of targeting away from cities and toward nuclear stockpiles and infrastructure related to nuclear war as the Cold War progressed and advancements in nuclear weapons and intelligence-collection technologies made it possible to precisely target those weapons.


According to Schwartz, this map depicts the crucial locations that Russia would need to attack in order to eliminate the US nuclear arsenal:


  • Although a massive strike of this magnitude would not guarantee anything, the map depicts targets for an all-out assault on the US’s fixed nuclear infrastructure, weapons, and command-and-control centers.
  • Schwartz told Insider, “It’s extremely unlikely that such an attack would be fully successful.” It would have to be flawless to pull off an attack like this because there are so many variables. The things you missed will come back at you if even a few weapons escape.”
  • Nuclear submarines in the United States could and would respond in kind even if every intercontinental ballistic missile silo, stockpile of nuclear weapons, and nuclear-capable bomber were destroyed.
  • The United States has four to five nuclear-armed submarines “on hard alert, in their patrol areas, awaiting orders for launch,” according to Schwartz.
  • Even high-ranking US military officials don’t know where the silent submarines are, and Russia won’t be able to find them all before it fires back, as Schwartz said could happen in 5 to 15 minutes.


However, depending on how the wind blew, a strike on a relatively sparsely populated area could still result in death and destruction throughout the United States. This is due to the consequences.